Timeline for Meaning of "mongólica"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 28, 2017 at 21:51 | comment | added | DGaleano | @leonbloy Agree. Colloquial if you don't use it in front of the relatives to the person with the condition or anyone that cares. If the relatives are around then it would not be "politically correct" and might be rude. | |
| Sep 28, 2017 at 18:57 | comment | added | leonbloy | @DGaleano Actually, today, that sounds more "rude" than "colloquial" (to allude to a person with Down's syndrome), even in informal settings. The informal normal/polite way is "Susa es Down". | |
| Sep 28, 2017 at 0:21 | history | edited | Diego | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved formatting
|
| Sep 27, 2017 at 20:57 | comment | added | DGaleano | Obviously this applies if the person doesn't have Down's syndrome, otherwise is just the colloquial way to refer to that condition. If the person does not have the condition and it is called that, then is like calling that person dumb or stupid which obviously is very rude. | |
| Sep 27, 2017 at 19:45 | history | answered | Mauricio Martinez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |