10

You can find hundreds of sources where they say that the subject can be dropped if it doesn't add any additional information. As "voy" is the 1st person singular conjugation of "ir", you know that the subject is "yo". That sounds reasonable when coming from the English language, where conjugation is basically missing.

Well, but my mother-tongue is German and in German we do decline verbs as well. As "gehe" is the 1st person singular conjugation of "gehen", the subject is "ich". But in German you generally don't omit the subject.
And that's true for other languages, too. French, for instance. As "vais" is the 1st person singular conjugation of "aller", the subject is "je".

So, how come that Spanish language has developed in a different way?

3
  • My theory (supported by no actual evidence that I've found, but to me it seems logical) is that it has to do with ambiguity. In German, many of the different "types" of subjects share a single form. In French, you pronounce about one letter in each word :), so you can't really tell the difference between the forms. I realize this theory might not hold up when talking about other languages about which I really don't know, but it just seems logical to me. So pro-drop languages tend to have distinct forms for each subject.
    – Aprendedor
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 22:52
  • @Aprendedor I am not sure if I understand you. What do you mean here by subject? The grammatical subject as I refer to in my question. In that case, there's no difference between German and Spanish. I mean in both languages they are distinct. With one exception in German ("sie"). Or was it a typo and you wanted to say verb form (conjugation)? But then there is ambiguity in both languages. For instance, Spanish "yo/él estaba", German "wir/sie sind".
    – Em1
    Commented Jun 4, 2015 at 6:43
  • I meant that the subjects share a single verb form. And even though there is indeed ambiguity in both languages with regard to this, in German, there seems to be "more" ambiguity. "Wir" and "sie" always share the same form, but "ich" and "er" often share the same form as well. "Yo" and "él" do share the same form in some cases (like the imperfect, subjunctive, and conditional), but it is still not in every form.
    – Aprendedor
    Commented Jun 6, 2015 at 16:35

2 Answers 2

11

Lovely question!

The conjugation of a verb in Spanish has more info about the person: in German sie, Sie und wir are conjugated the same way, and here is the key: they always coincide. Also in the singular, the verb for some personal pronouns very often coincide (ich muss, er muss). So you do need a personal pronoun in German. And well, in English, as you say, for obvious reasons you cannot drop it.

As for French, you do write different, but phonetically there is no distinction between (tu) vas and il va (unless you have some vowel right after). This holds not only for aller.

So, basically, my hypothesis is that since in Spanish from Spain in most of the verbs in various tenses the conjugation fully determines the person, there is no need to keep track of it. Then, although in some versions of Latinamerican Spanish ustedes is used instead of vosotros and the former has the same conjugation of ellos, dropping the pronoun was inherited.

You basically economize without loosing information. There is no information redundancy. (Nice feature, isn't it? [1]) To support the statement, there is (at least) another language which, to some extent, does the same: Russian. There conjugation is so irregular, that you might omit the pronoun. (Example: знать in present is conjugated as знаю, знаешь, знает, знаем, знаете, знают. The forms are all different)

However, you might want to keep the personal pronoun if you want to emphasize the person. Dropping the person would be like in Dutch choosing je as a personal pronoun and saying the pronoun would be choosing jij.

Late Edit: I just realized there is a name for those languages: pro-drop.


[1] I think the German analogous of "no information redundancy" –although departing from verbs and I'm unsure if that was how it developed– would be that in the schwache Deklination of adjectives you kind of drop lots of their endings, for the determinate article already has them:

ein netter Kumpel Vs. der nette Kumpel (← you no longer need to write netter, for der is already saying that the noun is masculine, while ein doesn't)

8
  • 1
    There is some truth in what you say, but things are not so simple. In Japanese, for example, they don't have declension and omit the subject even more than in Spanish. There is no confusion and everything is inferred from context. So declension is just one factor, not the whole answer.
    – Albertus
    Commented Dec 26, 2013 at 19:01
  • 1
    Portuguese often drops the subject as well. The conjugation in Portuguese is very similar (in many verb/tense combinations, identical) to Spanish, so the same reasoning would follow.
    – Flimzy
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 8:30
  • @Flimzy yes, well, I didn't dare to write that, because I don't speak Portuguese. But it's mentioned in the article as pro-drop language.
    – c.p.
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 9:00
  • Mh, at least the speakers of Russian I know rarely (if ever) drop the pronoun. I even asked them about this once and they said it sounds strange if you do. Maybe it varies across the country. Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 13:10
  • 1
    @Em1 Well, in "как тебя зовут?" "тебя" is indeed a pronoun, but it's in accusative, that is, there still a pronoun omission. The question without it would be: "как тебя зовут они?" (wie nennen dich? Vs. Wie nennen sie dich?) And you are right, the to be verb is omitted (for the present tense). So that's precisely why you are not unable to omit the pronoun there: there is not even a verb to inflect! "очень красивая" или "очень красивый" would incorrect forms for a second person as вы (may you do say "очень красивая" when the context is clear)
    – c.p.
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 15:34
2

As far as I know Latin also allow to drop the subject: v.g. cogito ergo sum does not have an explicit subject ego.

So the question might be backwards: why other Latin-derived languages such as French require the subject? In Italian, Catalan or Galician you can drop it. In Portuguese you cannot (yet Portuguese and Galician are almost the same language.)

As Spanish has verbal declination by person, it reduces ambiguity compared to English, but that's only part of the answer. Spanish just evolved that way while English had a different evolutive path.

French had added ambiguity in verb declinations given its phonetics, and this is partly solved by forcing the subject's pronoun, but some linguists actually see that French “subject pronouns” are really part of the declination. Compare:

Je vais au cinéma.
Moi, Je vais au cinéma.

With Spanish:

Voy al cine.
Yo voy al cine.

The actual explicit subject in spoken French is moi, while je vais is the first person declination, although in writing it still behaves as je being the subject and vais being the declination. (and moi being just an emphatic repetition.)

This phenomenon is replicated in some Francoitalic dialects such as Piedmontese, but it does not explain why Galician keeps the dropping of subjects, while Portuguese does not.

Which leads to the actual answer: that's how each language is.

1
  • 1
    Portuguese does often drop the subject as well. See here and here.
    – Flimzy
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 8:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.