7

It is known that the Latin language had both long and short vowel sounds. Nonetheless, the Spanish language does not have this differentiation and only has short vowels... or at least it seems so. When I was studying Japanese and learning how to transcribe Spanish words into Japanese, the teacher told us that it was OK to simulate the stressed vowels with a long vowel in Japanese. So, words such as "Sevilla" could be transcribed with a long i to simulate the stress in that vowel. Now I wonder if we really utter the stressed vowels a bit longer than the non-stressed ones.

But the real question is: in the evolution from Latin language to the current Spanish language, when did we lose the long vowels? Were the long vowels lost along the evolution of Vulgar Latin (as it seems from the Wikipedia article) or did they somehow reach the Old Spanish language?

Bonus: are there any reminiscences of the long vowel sounds in the current Spanish language?

2
  • Está la teoría del sustrato vasco, aunque no conozco el tema muy bien para saber explicarlo correctamente y no sé si es la teoría más aceptada o no, pero es un sitio por el que empezar a investigar.
    – user14069
    Sep 25, 2017 at 8:10
  • I always wondered whether outsourcing teaching jobs to Greek teacher slaves had something to do with it? :-) Greek happens to sound almost exactly as Spanish in terms of vowel lengths. Some Spanish are also rather quick in picking up modern Greek. Feb 12, 2021 at 22:32

1 Answer 1

4

There are indeed short and long vowel sounds in Spanish, but they are not phonemic, i. e. they are not contrastive. Vowels tend to become longer when stressed; this is very common across languages. Wikipedia says "stressed syllables can be up to 50% longer in duration than non-stressed syllables" in Spanish.

Since Japanese has a vowel quantity contrast but does not have phonemic stress, using one to suggest the other sounds right: it amounts, in fact, to forcing the same correlation between length and stress that is found in Spanish.

The process whereby vowel quantity was lost in Vulgar Latin must have taken quite a long time, but as far as I know Old Spanish already had no trace of vowel quantity. Wikipedia says "Length confusions seem to have begun in unstressed vowels, but they were soon generalized." This is to be expected, since unstressed syllables are usually most prone to loss of phonemic distinctions (neutralization).

In Classical Latin, actual length was not the only difference between so-called long and short vowels: as it happens in many other languages, long vowels were also tense and short vowels were also lax. Mistakes noted by grammarians show that this was so: people tended to mix up short e and i and short o and u (long and short a could not be distinguished by tenseness; /a/ lost its quantity contrast when the rest of the vowels did).

In the end the tense-lax contrast won the game and people started distinguishing vowels only by tenseness and only in stressed syllables. Later the system was simplified even more by conflating (in some branches of Romance) lax i with tense e and lax u with tense o.

The above is how Italian and Portuguese got their seven vowels. Spanish went further by diphthongizing the lax vowels in stressed syllables (/e/→/ie/, /o/→/ue/) and merging them with the tense ones elsewhere, ending up with the current five.

Right now phonemic vowel length exists in a few Romance languages, but in every case it is a new development.

4
  • 1
    Great answer. A potential addition might be that vowel length can be phonemic in Spanish in certain dialects where the /s/ phoneme effectively loses all aspiration in syllable final positions: it gets realized as [:], lengthening the previous vowel. May 16, 2018 at 16:09
  • @guifa Are those Andalusian dialects? I've heard of that.
    – pablodf76
    May 16, 2018 at 22:00
  • Also Caribbean if my memory serves me correct. The Andalusian Spanish can also have vowel quality modified a bit, I believe. May 16, 2018 at 22:25
  • Reading up a bit on that, it seems that the phonemic distinction being made here is laxing. Consonants at the end of a syllable make vowels lax; when syllable-final /s/ is lost, the laxing has already taken place, so at the end of an open syllable you can have either a lax or a tense vowel.
    – pablodf76
    May 17, 2018 at 22:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.