The Spanish word 'rey' used to be spelt rei (as it still is in some old place names, e.g. Plaça del Rei).

Why did it change from one spelling to another?

  • 2
    From the DPD: "[Se usa y] Cuando el sonido /i/ va en posición final de palabra y está precedido de otra vocal con la que forma diptongo, o de dos con las que forma triptongo: muy, Uruguay". – Yay Oct 15 '16 at 13:47
  • 1
    Have you been recently in Catalonia, right? :-) – user11977 Oct 15 '16 at 15:45
  • Also note that there are not Spanish words ending in an unstressed [i] sound that are spelling with a terminal -i – Chase Ryan Taylor Oct 15 '16 at 18:48
  • 1
    Note you can see the origin of each street in Barcelona using their nomenclàtor page. For Plaça del Rei we read that it was previously called Plaza del Rey, as places used to be officially in Spanish for many years. – fedorqui Oct 15 '16 at 19:04

The rei spelling occurs in many Western Romance languages, but not in Castilian. The most ancient epic poem that remains to us in Old Spanish, El Cantar de mio Çid, notably has these lines:

En yra del rey Alffonsso yo sere metido.
Si con uusco escapo sano o biuo
Aun çerca o tarde el rey querer me ha por amigo;
Si non quanto dexo no lo preçio un figo.
Ffablo Myo Çid, el que en buen ora çinxo espada:
Martin Antolinez, sodes ardida lança:
Si yo biuo doblar uos he la soldada.

So rey was already spelled rey back in the Twelfth Century. The same is true of plaza, although other words did use the cedilla:

Vio que entrellos e el castiello mucho auie grand plaza:
Mando tornar la senna, apriessa espoloneaua:
Ffirid los caualleros, todos sines dubdança.

In contrast, it is now spelled rei in most other Iberian Romance, including in Asturian, Aragonese, Catalan, Galician, and Portuguese. Old Portuguese shared the rey spelling with Castilian, but that is no longer used today.

Shifting Orthographies

Let’s remember that just as the Latin alphabet did not originally have the letter v (let alone w) but only u, so too did it have no letter y or j, only i. This meant that the u and i had to serve as both vowel and consonant.

Another important point is that there was no “fixed orthography” for many centuries. Different scribes spelled things differently, and no one thought anything of this. Notice how in El Cid above, you see the spellings biuo for modern vivo and myo for modern mío.

But even after the printing press, there was a great deal of variation. It was not so long ago that San Isidro was San Ysidro, and even the Castilian conjunction y was of old written e (as in Portuguese) and much more recently sometimes seen written as i (as in Catalan).

The website www.curiosidario.es “Curiosidario: Curiosidades de la Lengua Española” has an article on the Historia de las letras in which they write:

En el español antiguo la representación del sonido [i] la compartían la i (conocida como i corta o media), la llamada baja o larga (origen de nuestra j, como vimos en su apartado) y la I (conocida como alta). A su vez, la i corta o media y la i baja o larga (j) podían hacer oficio de consonantes, invadiendo el terreno de la y, con lo que la y se vio obligada a invadir el terreno vocálico de las otras. Debido a tal confusión, no era poco frecuente ver, por ejemplo, la palabra viejo escrita también vieio o vjeio; o mayor y maIor; o sin y sjn; o isla eysla; o Pompeyo, Pompejo y Pompeio. La solución empezó a darse con la aparición de la imprenta, pero tardó siglos en llegarse al acuerdo actual: i es vocal en todos los casos, i griega para la conjunción copulativa más para el sonido [i] al final de palabras que acaben en -ái, -éi, -ói y frecuentemente en -úi (Uruguay, guiriguay, ley, doy, muy).

Así pues, desde 1726 la y se convirtió oficialmente en la conjunción copulativa del español, menos cuando la siguiente palabra empieza con i, en cuyo caso se sustituye por una e.

So for example, from Gonzalo de Berceo we read in Milagros de Nuestra Sennora from the thirteenth century, we read “nunqua varón en duenna metió maior querencia” for what we would now write “nunca varón en dueña metió mayor querencia”.

There are many, many more examples of writing being different in past centuries than it is today. There are many reasons for this, however, with various stories to be be had for each.

  • Rey in plural is reyes. I don't know about Catalonian, but in Asturian and Portuguese, where king is also rei, the plural is reis. That follows normal plural rules: add s if ending in a vowel (i), add es if ending in a consonant. But now with many imported words, like gay, you now have to memorize (gais), so while rule is less useful in modern times, it can illustrate past rationales. – guifa Oct 15 '16 at 16:06
  • Why did rey become rei (and vice versa in other languages)? – BladorthinTheGrey Oct 15 '16 at 16:07
  • @guifa I presume that is because gay is an import. Other words are regular, like buey > bueyes. There is some dispute over guay > ?guays but I don’t know that word’s origin. – tchrist Oct 15 '16 at 16:16
  • Plural of Rei in Catalan is Reis – user11977 Oct 15 '16 at 16:28
  • Probably Catalan, Galician, Asturian, Portuges had not the same influcence of the arabic (800 years of influcence) than Castillian. In consequence they kept the essence of the Romance languages for longer than Castillian. Read about History of the Catalan. Special atention to the animated gift. Castillian had lot more foreign languages (influences) around than Catalan. – user11977 Oct 15 '16 at 18:05

Notice that Plaça del Rei is Catalán, not Spanish.

In spanish:

Plaza del Rey

Catalán and Spanish are different languages.

Why Catalan kept the word Rei closer to its original form Regis from the Latin, I think is due to Catalan (among other Romance languages) has kept historically the influcence of the Romance for longer than Castillian.

Castillian, due to its political-economical-military expanssion along the peninsula (for more than 5 centuries), suffered more changes than Catalan. So it kept its Romance nature for less than Catalan.

Its a poor resume but 800 years of history is hard to summarize. I suggest taking a look to the History of Catalan for more references.

  • 1
    OK, that explains it! I presume that the Old Spanish was rei and so the equivalent terms in Modern Spanish (rey), Portuguese and Catalan (both rei) are all descendants. – BladorthinTheGrey Oct 15 '16 at 15:51
  • Both languages come from the Latín so there're lot of words that sounds alike. And also are typed alike. – user11977 Oct 15 '16 at 15:53
  • 1
    Rey n. from 10th cent. Old Spanish reie. From Latin regem, accusative of rex 'id.' From Proto-Italic *rēgs 'id.' From Proto-Indo-European *h3rēǵs 'id.' This is probably the route. – BladorthinTheGrey Oct 15 '16 at 15:54

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.