2

Am I correct that some present tense are the same conjugation in preterit tense?

For instance, "hablamos".

Or "hablo" is another example.

How do you tell the difference?

4
  • 'Hablo' does not fit your criteria. – Paul Aug 14 '16 at 3:38
  • @Paul yes it does. – Vladimir Nul Aug 16 '16 at 12:47
  • @VladimirNul: the accent makes a big difference. – Paul Aug 16 '16 at 17:44
  • hablamos doesn't have an acute. – Vladimir Nul Aug 16 '16 at 18:11
9

In the indicative mood hablamos is both present and past and is the rest of the sentence that tells you the time.

Nosotros hablamos del partido = We talk about the game.

Ayer hablamos del partido = We talked yesterday about the game.

The situation with hablo is different because hablo is present of the first person and habló is past of the third (notice the accent mark):

Yo hablo del partido = I talk about the game.

Él habló del partido = He talked about the game.

The indicative present and past conjugation of the verb hablar are as follows:

+------------+--------------+--------------+
|            |   Present    |     Past     |
+------------+--------------+--------------+
| - Yo       | hablo        | hablé        |
| - Tú       | hablas       | hablaste     |
| - Él       | habla        | habló        |
| - Nosotros | hablamos     | hablamos     |
| - Vosotros | habláis      | hablasteis   |
| - Ellos    | hablan       | hablaron     |
+------------+--------------+--------------+

There is also an imperfect form but you can check it out here.

1
  • 1
    @Roddy Since you're new here, note you can mark an answer accepted if your question is already solved. You can do it clicking on the check mark beside the answer to toggle it from hollow to green. See Help Center > Asking if you have any question! – fedorqui 'SO stop harming' Aug 16 '16 at 8:23
4

Any regular verb of the first conjugation (verbs with infinitive ending in 'ar') have this condition for the first plural person: jugamos, bailamos, rezamos... in fact just now I can't think of irregular verbs that doesn't meet the condition.

In the third conjugation (verbs ending in 'ir') it happens too, like in dormimos, discutimos, salimos, reímos. An exception can be found in vamos/fuimos.

We tell the difference just by the context: in common uses is really simple, however, in poetry or some obscure texts it can lead to confusion.

2
  • The point with ir is that it's an irregular verb. I think this should be the accepted answer. – mclopez Aug 19 '16 at 18:08
  • You can't think of irregular verbs that does not meet the condition? – MarcoCiafa Jun 8 '20 at 18:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.