Timeline for Is RAE's definition of "subjunctive" from 1771 still valid today?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2018 at 9:29 | answer | added | julodnik | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 16, 2017 at 16:54 | comment | added | Charlie | @PeterTaylor that's a very interesting point of view and a nice example of lateral thinking. I have added that possibility to the question. | |
| Oct 16, 2017 at 16:53 | history | edited | Charlie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Oct 16, 2017 at 16:49 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | That looks like a false dichotomy: what about the possibility that the definition from 1771 was wrong then and is still wrong now? | |
| Oct 16, 2017 at 1:10 | comment | added | user0721090601 | No me parecen contradictorias. Antes se definía segundo su situación sintáctica, y ahora parece que prefieren definirlo según su valor semántico. No obstante, el subjuntivo sí era más común en el pasado y se usaba en situaciones subordinadas que hoy emplean el indicativo, por lo que hoy creo que la definición semántica puede quedar más adecuada al uso moderno. | |
| Oct 13, 2017 at 7:32 | history | asked | Charlie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |