Timeline for Grammatical explanation of "He"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2015 at 15:13 | comment | added | Sergio Velasquez | @MikMik my comment was wrong. I added a dot in the wrong place. It must be: in some cases, haber !=tener, just a clarification. Thanks for note that. | |
| Aug 28, 2015 at 15:09 | comment | added | MikMik | @SergioVelásquez Actually, Haber = Poseer = Tener, though, to be fair, it's an old usage. | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 7:21 | comment | added | Alberto Martín | He is talking about the "grammatical" aspect; I'm quite sure that he is aware of the meaning-difference you point. | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 23:35 | history | edited | Alberto Martín | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2015 at 17:34 | comment | added | Sergio Velasquez | It's not exactly the same as to have. You must Remember that to have is used for tener, in some cases. Haber != Tener | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 8:33 | comment | added | Alberto Martín | I'm glad it helped to clarify it :) | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 8:06 | vote | accept | Kyle | ||
| Aug 17, 2015 at 8:06 | vote | accept | Kyle | ||
| Aug 17, 2015 at 8:06 | |||||
| Aug 17, 2015 at 7:55 | comment | added | Kyle | Thank you for your answer it may be hard to believe, and indeed after reading your answer it is hard for me to believe myself, but I have never been taught about haber or seen examples of it and so I was thinking of "he" in terms of a type of pronoun. Thanks again for your answer! | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 7:37 | history | edited | Alberto Martín | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 182 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2015 at 7:28 | history | answered | Alberto Martín | CC BY-SA 3.0 |