321 reputation
13
bio website
location Lima, Peru
age 26
visits member for 2 years, 7 months
seen Jul 11 at 7:49

Subject is a functional programming and type theory nerd. The extent to which mathematical thinking has affected subject has not been fully assessed yet, but the brain damage is known to be quite serious already. In particular, subject's ability to communicate with other programmers (such as his coworkers) is severely hampered by his tendency to talk about abstract concepts in terms of themselves rather than in terms of examples.

Subject has expressed hope that a language will be developed with the following features:

  1. as concise as GHC Haskell (at least for the non-proof parts of his programs)
  2. as modular as Standard ML (also add applicative functors)
  3. as pedantic about correctness as Coq (without the admit tactic)
  4. compiles to native binaries as fast as C (with pointers marked as "restrict" whenever possible, and preferring direct system calls to libc calls)
  5. a comprehensive standard library of data structures and algorithms, in the spirit of C++'s STL, but better

Subject has been observed talking about what he calls "deep" analogies between type systems and database schemas. Subject has expressed dismay at the failure of major DBMS implementors to provide sufficiently expressive schemas, alleging that this failure forces him to encode certain business model constraints as database triggers, which he claims is "time-consuming" and "error-prone". Mentioning NoSQL in subject's presence must be avoided at all costs - subject may go on a rampage and cause both material destruction and loss of life.

Subject's outlook on life has been interestingly affected by recent developments, such as his exposure to the Rust programming language, which he now claims has the potential to unify the mathematical elegance of Haskell with the performance focus of C and C++. Subject is probably the only Rust programmer trying to do purely functional programming in Rust. "A Fortran programmer can write Fortran programs in any language. A Haskell programmer will dismiss any language he cannot write Haskell programs in." Rust is one of the few languages subject has not dismissed so far. For some perspective on what this achievement means, especially for a C-family language, the list of languages subject has dismissed includes even the likes of Scala and F#.

Subject goes by the nick "pyon" on both Freenode and Mozilla's IRC network.


Dec
12
comment Translating “young man” and “young woman”
@vartec: True. I forgot that.
Dec
10
comment Difference between 'trabajar para' and 'trabajar por'
@Trufa: I would use "trabajar en lugar de" instead of "trabajar por". But, then, I am a little too obsessed when it comes to non-ambiguity.
Dec
10
comment Why is “Usted” grammatically a third person?
"Usted" and "ustedes" are similar to Portuguese's "você" and "vocês", which are also grammatically third persons.
Dec
10
comment Are there any differences between “de nada” and “por nada”?
"De nada" (you are welcome) is correct. However, some people incorrectly use "por nada" when they mean "de nada", and you should be ready to infer by context whether they mean "you are welcome" or "thanks for nothing", which, ironically, are kind of opposite in meaning.
Dec
10
comment Computer science, software engineer/developer, and programmer
@Trufa: "Ingeniero de sistemas" (systems engineer) and "ingeniero de software" (software engineer) are not equivalent.