Take the 2-minute tour ×
Spanish Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Spanish language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In "The Grapes of Wrath"/"Las Uvas de la Ira", the name Joan Crawford appears in the original (English) text. In the Spanish translation, that has been rendered as "fulana."

My understanding is that:

Fulano = John Doe (some guy)
Fulana = Jane Doe (some woman)
Fulanito = some kid (boy)

Assuming my understanding is correct, why is Joan Crawford reduced to a "somebody" here? Is it out of sensitivity/respect (the passage discusses her "sleeping her way into the movies")?

share|improve this question
2  
Censorship, maybe? Although I don't think she was so controversial. –  rodrigo Jul 10 at 19:33
1  
where the book was translated and by whom? –  Emilio Gort Jul 10 at 20:47
    
I don't know; I don't have it with me at the moment. Somebody said earlier it seemed like a "Spain Spanish" translation (as opposed to a "Mexican" or "Latin America" Spanish. It is the Centennial edition; you can see it here: amazon.com/Las-uvas-ira-Spanish-language/dp/0142002534 –  B. Clay Shannon Jul 10 at 21:06
1  
You should provide us with both the original and the translated sentences. Otherwise, we can just make wild guesses. –  Gorpik Jul 11 at 11:03

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

First, as you can see in the Real Academia Española's dictionary, "fulana" also means prostitute.

This novel was pusblished at the end of Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) and just a year after the 1938 Press Law, that was adopted mainly to control the republican press. With this law a period of heavy state censorship began, and this could be the cause of a woman with "loose morals" appearing as "fulana" in the books published during this period.

share|improve this answer
2  
This is it. With the added guess that this peculiar translator probably thought "my target audience wouldn't know who Joan Crawford is (or even "I don't know who she is") so let's just write the bowdlerized word for whore here". From this and OP's previous questions, it doesn't look as a sterling translation to me... –  angus Jul 11 at 20:19
    
It doesn't seem to be a very good translation, agree... :P –  Rocío García Luque Jul 14 at 9:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.