Take the 2-minute tour ×
Spanish Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Spanish language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider this translation:

I would have jumped the rope.

Hubiese saltado a la cuerda.

Now, how would we translate the same sentence if I added "if I had to" to it?

I would have jumped the rope if I had to.

share|improve this question
1  
It's not hubiese, but habría. The subjunctive goes in the "si..." part, and the conditional in the other one. –  MikMik May 30 at 14:11
1  
"Si tuviera que..." would also work in this case. –  Paul Jun 2 at 22:01

4 Answers 4

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Your example is wrong to begin with.

I would have jumped the rope.

Hubiese saltado la cuerda.

Hubiese saltado la cuerda translats to Had I jumped the rope

The correct translation would be

I would have jumped the rope.

Habría saltado la cuerda.

Here is how I would say it:

Si tuviera que saltarla, habría saltado la cuerda

Si tuviera que saltar la cuerda, la habría saltado

If you use haber, like in this sentence

Si hubiese tenido que hacerlo, habría saltado la cuerda

It will translate to:

If I had had to do it, I would have jumped the rope.


Hubiese and Hubiera are the same thing, by the way.

If you want to say, I would have done it, you would say

Lo habría hecho

When you start writing conditional statements, with a cause, and reason.. you get sentences like this

If I had an apple, then I would eat it

Si yo tuviera una manzana la comería

It boils down to this guideline

If... something in the subjunctive.. then... something in the conditional..

or

Something in the conditional, then.. something subjunctive.

example

Yo habría saltado la cuerda si yo tuviera que hacerlo.

share|improve this answer
1  
Si tuviera que saltarla la habría saltado a la cuerda is wrong. And so is your next sentence, which has two mistakes less than the former. But I also had that mistake because I Ctrl+V-ed from the OP. Namely, one doesn't say a la cuerda but la cuerda. –  c.p. May 29 at 21:39
    
Moreover, I don't know in English, but in Spanish that combination of tenses sounds strange. –  c.p. May 29 at 22:02
    
If the only reason you say that I'm wrong is because I said saltar a, then the OP is wrong... The question was about the use of past subjunctive, but was using it incorrectly. He was using the subjunctive when he should have used the conditional tense. –  dockeryz May 30 at 2:06
    
OK, this leaves me thoroughly confused. "A la cuerda" or just "la cuerda"? "Hubiese" or "habría"? How about just skipping the "haber" and use "tuviese" instead? What would be the difference in the meanings? –  Amit Schandillia May 30 at 5:51
    
Yeap, the OP is wrong. But I downvoted because of the object (la) repetition; and there's no comma. –  c.p. May 30 at 5:57

It's not answering the question you posed but it's what you want to know:

Hubiese saltado la cuerda si hubiese tenido que (hacerlo).

The omission of the last verb is advanced. Or

Si hubiese tenido que hacerlo, hubiese saltado la cuerda.

share|improve this answer
    
Instead of "...hubiese tenido que...", can't one just say, "...tuviese que..."? –  Amit Schandillia May 29 at 8:59
    
Can I use "pudiese" if I want to say "...if I could"? Sorry if the question seems a tad off-track. –  Amit Schandillia May 29 at 11:35
1  
@c.p. Si hubiese tenido que hacerlo, hubiese saltado la cuerda. would mean.. If I had had to do it, had jumped the rope. –  dockeryz May 29 at 20:38
    
@dockeryz You're right. –  c.p. May 29 at 21:32
2  
"Si hubiese tenido que hacerlo, habría saltado la cuerda" –  MikMik May 30 at 14:12

The correct phrase is:

Habría saltado la cuerda si hubiera tenido que hacerlo.

Correct, but slightly clumsy. Some alternatives:

Si hubiera tenido que saltar la cuerda, lo habría hecho.

Habría saltado la cuerda en caso de haber tenido que hacerlo.

Habría saltado la cuerda de ser necesario.

Habría saltado la cuerda de haberme visto obligado a ello.

share|improve this answer

If I had to cook -> Si yo tuviera que cocinar.

Si tuviera que cocinar is less accurate.

share|improve this answer
2  
Isn't it common for native speakers to omit the subject in regular conversations? –  Amit Schandillia May 30 at 5:47
    
tuviera or tuviese? –  Amit Schandillia May 30 at 5:51
1  
Tuviera and tuviese are exactly the same. If you look at any conjugation table, you'll see that it always says "tuviera o tuviese" (or so it should). For example, this one –  MikMik May 30 at 14:10
1  
@AmitSchandillia, yep, it's quite common. I'm a Spanish native speaker. –  Eva Thyssen May 30 at 19:16

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.