Take the 2-minute tour ×
Spanish Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Spanish language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I found this in Barron's Spanish-English dictionary and it piqued my interest:


It seems like a sure way to get into trouble in the wrong crowd. Do Spanish speakers use this expression?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The dictionary definition is wrong.

"Muslim" is translated as "Musulmán", which means somebody belonging to a specific religion. "Moro" means somebody belonging to a specific race: those who invaded Iberian Peninsule and its descendants, part of the current non-bereber population of Morocco.

The expression "(No) haber moros en la costa" is in no way pejorative, and can be safely used both in positive and negative forms.

The use of the word "moro" by itself is not pejorative if used in an Historic way (e.g. if you are talking about the Almohade empire, the so-called Spanish Reconquest period or the Taifas), but it most probably is if you are using it today in a non-ethnic way (e.g. "I was in a shop and it was filled with moros"). Only safe usage about today people is the ethnic way: "La población marroquí actual se compone de dos ramas principales: moros y bereberes". Even this one could be received as pejorative by some, even while it is not.

share|improve this answer
I agree except that moro can be used to someone who belong to Islam. RAE 3rd definition 3.adj. Que profesa la religión islámica –  AlexBcn Apr 22 '14 at 17:50
Moro is a reference to the Moors, which were the Muslims from Morocco. So technically, Moor is a reference to the place, which happened to be overwhelmingly Muslim. As a result, the meanings were collapsed. –  Chuck Krutsinger Apr 22 '14 at 22:07
@AlexBcn I know the RAE definition, but it is from just a linguistic point of view (e.g. how the language is used). I would never consider an Indonesian muslim a "moro". Historical POV is more correct than liguistic one, almost always. –  Envite Apr 23 '14 at 9:05
@ChuckKrutsinger Not all muslims from Morocco are moors. As I said above, some of them are bereber, quite a different race, with different customs. –  Envite Apr 23 '14 at 9:06
@Envite I'm not sure everyone agrees with you about the meaning of Moors. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors begins with "The Moors were the medieval Muslim inhabitants of Morocco, western Algeria, Western Sahara, Mauritania, the Iberian Peninsula, Sicily, and Malta. Their descendants are presently known as the Maghrebis." –  Chuck Krutsinger Apr 23 '14 at 14:18

This is actually used but It is not used to offend anybody. Actually I didn't know the origin of this but it seems to have one related with invasions as this blog says http://mariopiccone.blogspot.com/2007/09/el-origen-de-la-frase-no-hay-moros-en.html and also this one http://www.hispanoteca.eu/Foro-preguntas/ARCHIVO-Foro/Moros%20en%20la%20costa.htm

share|improve this answer

After over 700 years of war between the Muslims and the Catholics, it is not hard to understand the origin of this phrase. I repeat, 700 years of war! This is not including the Conquest wars after 1492 (The year in which the 700 year war ended and the Conquest began)

The phrase is no more pejorative than calling a Muslim a Muslim.

You could easily relate this phrase to The red coats are coming!. Although, most have never said nor heard The red coats aren't coming, the phrase The coast is clear suffices to say the least.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.