Take the 2-minute tour ×
Spanish Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Spanish language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Which of these sentences are correct when describing a period of time?

Viví en España 3 años y durante ese tiempo fui a la escuela y comí con mis amigos en la terraza.

Viví en España 3 años y durante ese tiempo iba a la escuela y comía con mis amigos en la terraza.

I understand that the difference is that imperfecto is the reoccurring action so in the 2nd example above, during the 3 years I lived in Spain I went to school more than once and I ate with friends more than once. But I also know that when you are talking about a specific period of time you use the pretérito, example 1 above. So in this case which would be the best to use?

share|improve this question
1  
Worth mention that the use of "por" in this case seems rather forced and unnecessary, it sounds much more natural if you'd say: "Viví en España 3 años y durante ese tiempo.." of even: "Viví en España durante 3 años y en ese tiempo...". –  Wawy Apr 16 at 8:29
    
I agree, also "Viví 3 años en España y ..." –  AlexBcn Apr 16 at 11:20

2 Answers 2

Unless you're telling it like a story, giving people details and a play-by-play, as if it were from a book, you would use the 2nd example.

share|improve this answer

Let's start with the ending: you didn't eat exclusively with your friends on the terrace, so you use the imperfect. Eating is a short event repeated an unspecified number of times, so the past perfect sounds wrong to me, unless you really ate for three years with your friends, on the terrace.

The "ir a la escuela" bit is more ambiguous, you could argue for the use both past tenses: you definitely don't go anymore to that school, and it's a specific period of time, but on the other hand, maybe you didn't go to school every day. Maybe you want to use the imperfect to give a sense of "unfinished business", maybe not. It's not incorrect to use either tense in that part of the sentence.

All this said, I'd use the second sentence. It's more "undefined", thanks to the use of the past imperfect, and that's what I'd use. Note that I'd do the opposite in English if I were to describe a 3 months' stay in London, where I studied English and occasionally ate with friends on the school's terrace.

As a pedantic aside, I have to say that, in any case, the sentence feels forced. Really, you lived in Spain for three years and what you can tell us about that is that you went to school and you ate with friends on the terrace? Which terrace, by the way? That "la" is very definite. It also gives an image of you eating there day after day, in summer, and winter, under the snow... The combination of interesting (school -> learning Spanish language and culture, making friends) and trivial (eating on the terrace) is really jarring.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.